Archiver object method · N/compress
add()
Archiver.add(options)
Adds a file to be archived.
- Implementation
- Not started
- Design
- Open for proposals suggest how it should read
A
suitescript api
1objArchiver.add({2 file: /* file.File, required */,3 directory: /* string, optional */4});
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| options.file | file.File | required | The file to be archived. |
| options.directory | string | optional | The target directory in the archive. If this parameter is not specified, the file is placed in the root directory of the archive. |
B
mynt syntax
No Mynt syntax yet.
Nothing in the language compiles to Archiver.add(options) today. How should it read?
C
community proposals
Competing syntax for add, from GitHub Discussions. Select two or more to compare them side by side.
Loading proposals from GitHub…
D
suggest an alternative
Write the Mynt you wish you could write.
A good proposal shows the syntax, the SuiteScript it should become, and argues for it: why it is clearer, how it fits the rest of the language, what it makes harder.
- Clarity. Does it say what happens, without ceremony?
- Consistency. Does it read like
load,saveandRef[field]? - Expressiveness. Does it cover the cases people actually write?
- Honesty. Does it hide a NetSuite cost, such as governance, that a reader should see?