SecureString object method · N/https
appendSecureString()
SecureString.appendSecureString(options)
Appends one https.SecureString to another https.SecureString .
- Implementation
- Not started
- Design
- Open for proposals suggest how it should read
A
suitescript api
1objSecureString.appendSecureString({2 secureString: /* https.SecureString, required */,3 keepEncoding: /* boolean, optional */4});
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| options.secureString | https.SecureString | required | The https.SecureString to append. |
| options.keepEncoding | boolean | optional | Keeps the appended string in its original encoding. Set this value to true to prevent unexpected content re-encoding. The default value is false. |
B
mynt syntax
No Mynt syntax yet.
Nothing in the language compiles to SecureString.appendSecureString(options) today. How should it read?
C
community proposals
Competing syntax for appendSecureString, from GitHub Discussions. Select two or more to compare them side by side.
Loading proposals from GitHub…
D
suggest an alternative
Write the Mynt you wish you could write.
A good proposal shows the syntax, the SuiteScript it should become, and argues for it: why it is clearer, how it fits the rest of the language, what it makes harder.
- Clarity. Does it say what happens, without ceremony?
- Consistency. Does it read like
load,saveandRef[field]? - Expressiveness. Does it cover the cases people actually write?
- Honesty. Does it hide a NetSuite cost, such as governance, that a reader should see?