mynt

module function · N/manufacturing/productionCharges

updateChargesToItemPurchasePrice()

productionCharges.updateChargesToItemPurchasePrice(options)

Updates cost on a specific transaction line according to the current purchase price of the originating item.

Implementation
Not started
Design
Open for proposals suggest how it should read
Proposals
A suitescript api
Signature
productionCharges.updateChargesToItemPurchasePrice(options)
Returns
void
Governance
None
Script types
Server scripts
Version
SuiteScript 2.x, documented for 2.1; since NetSuite 2026.1
call shapefrom Oracle's parameter table
1productionCharges.updateChargesToItemPurchasePrice({2    transactionId:      /* number, required */,3    transactionLineIds: /* number[], required */4});
Oracle reference for this method
ParameterTypeRequiredDescription
options.transactionIdnumberrequiredID of transaction to be updated.
options.transactionLineIdsnumber[]requiredArray of IDs of lines to be updated.
B mynt syntax

No Mynt syntax yet.

Nothing in the language compiles to productionCharges.updateChargesToItemPurchasePrice(options) today. How should it read?

C community proposals

Competing syntax for updateChargesToItemPurchasePrice, from GitHub Discussions. Select two or more to compare them side by side.

All discussions

Loading proposals from GitHub…

D suggest an alternative

Write the Mynt you wish you could write.

A good proposal shows the syntax, the SuiteScript it should become, and argues for it: why it is clearer, how it fits the rest of the language, what it makes harder.

  • Clarity. Does it say what happens, without ceremony?
  • Consistency. Does it read like load, save and Ref[field]?
  • Expressiveness. Does it cover the cases people actually write?
  • Honesty. Does it hide a NetSuite cost, such as governance, that a reader should see?

N/manufacturing/productionCharges · productionCharges.updateChargesToItemPurchasePrice(options)

Suggest syntax for updateChargesToItemPurchasePrice