module function · N/pgp
createMessageData()
pgp.createMessageData(options)
Creates new message data.
- Implementation
- Not started
- Design
- Open for proposals suggest how it should read
A
suitescript api
1pgp.createMessageData({2 content: /* string, required */,3 filename: /* string, optional */,4 date: /* Date object, optional */,5 format: /* pgp.Format, optional */6});
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| options.content | string | required | Content of the message. |
| options.filename | string | optional | File name if the message represents a file, empty string otherwise. |
| options.date | Date object | optional | Date of the message or modification date of the file. Default value = new Date() . |
| options.format | pgp.Format | optional | Literal data packet type. Default value = Format.UTF8 , if content is a string. Format.BINARY otherwise. |
B
mynt syntax
No Mynt syntax yet.
Nothing in the language compiles to pgp.createMessageData(options) today. How should it read?
C
community proposals
Competing syntax for createMessageData, from GitHub Discussions. Select two or more to compare them side by side.
Loading proposals from GitHub…
D
suggest an alternative
Write the Mynt you wish you could write.
A good proposal shows the syntax, the SuiteScript it should become, and argues for it: why it is clearer, how it fits the rest of the language, what it makes harder.
- Clarity. Does it say what happens, without ceremony?
- Consistency. Does it read like
load,saveandRef[field]? - Expressiveness. Does it cover the cases people actually write?
- Honesty. Does it hide a NetSuite cost, such as governance, that a reader should see?