module function · N/workbook

createSortByMeasure()

workbook.createSortByMeasure(options)

Creates a sort based on a measure.

Implementation
Not started
Design
Open for proposals suggest how it should read
Proposals
A
Signature
workbook.createSortByMeasure(options)
Returns
workbook.SortByMeasure
Governance
None
Script types
Server scripts
Version
SuiteScript 2.x, documented for 2.1; since NetSuite 2021.2
call shapefrom Oracle's parameter table
1workbook.createSortByMeasure({2    measure:  /* workbook.CalculatedMeasure | workbook.DataMeasure, required */,3    selector: /* Array< workbook.DescendantorSelfNodesSelector | workbook.DimensionSelector | workbook.PathSelector >, required */,4    sort:     /* workbook.Sort, required */5});
Oracle reference for this method
ParameterTypeRequiredDescription
options.measureworkbook.CalculatedMeasure | workbook.DataMeasurerequiredThe measure to sort by.
options.selectorArray< workbook.DescendantorSelfNodesSelector | workbook.DimensionSelector | workbook.PathSelector >requiredThe selector for the sort.
options.sortworkbook.SortrequiredThe sort used to create.
B

No Mynt syntax yet.

Nothing in the language compiles to workbook.createSortByMeasure(options) today. How should it read?

C

Competing syntax for createSortByMeasure, from GitHub Discussions. Select two or more to compare them side by side.

All discussions

Loading proposals from GitHub…

D

Write the Mynt you wish you could write.

A good proposal shows the syntax, the SuiteScript it should become, and argues for it: why it is clearer, how it fits the rest of the language, what it makes harder.

  • Clarity. Does it say what happens, without ceremony?
  • Consistency. Does it read like load, save and Ref[field]?
  • Expressiveness. Does it cover the cases people actually write?
  • Honesty. Does it hide a NetSuite cost, such as governance, that a reader should see?

N/workbook · workbook.createSortByMeasure(options)

Suggest syntax for createSortByMeasure