Document object method · N/xml
createAttributeNS()
Document.createAttributeNS(options)
Creates an attribute node of type ATTRIBUTE_NODE, with the specified namespace value and optional specified value.
- Implementation
- Not started
- Design
- Open for proposals suggest how it should read
A
suitescript api
1objDocument.createAttributeNS({2 namespaceURI: /* string, required */,3 qualifiedName: /* string, required */,4 value: /* string, optional */5});
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| options.namespaceURI | string | required | Namespace URI of the attribute to create. Value can be null . |
| options.qualifiedName | string | required | Qualified name of the new attribute node. |
| options.value | string | optional | Value for the attribute node. If unspecified, the value is an empty string. |
B
mynt syntax
No Mynt syntax yet.
Nothing in the language compiles to Document.createAttributeNS(options) today. How should it read?
C
community proposals
Competing syntax for createAttributeNS, from GitHub Discussions. Select two or more to compare them side by side.
Loading proposals from GitHub…
D
suggest an alternative
Write the Mynt you wish you could write.
A good proposal shows the syntax, the SuiteScript it should become, and argues for it: why it is clearer, how it fits the rest of the language, what it makes harder.
- Clarity. Does it say what happens, without ceremony?
- Consistency. Does it read like
load,saveandRef[field]? - Expressiveness. Does it cover the cases people actually write?
- Honesty. Does it hide a NetSuite cost, such as governance, that a reader should see?